What you need to know
- In what was supposed to be a fun look back at an iconic video came character, the official Google Play Store account revealed it doesn’t know anything about Sonic the Hedgehog on X (formerly Twitter).
- Every single post in the X thread was hit with a Community Note pointing out the glaring and obvious inaccuracies.
- By the end, we heard from Sonic himself, who joined in with X users poking fun at the original Google Play Store thread.
The official Google Play Store account on X (formerly Twitter) frequently highlights video games, characters, and pop-culture moments on its page. But something that was supposed to be a fun look back at one of the most iconic video game characters ever ended up backfiring for the Play Store’s social team. In a thread about the history of Sonic the Hedgehog, the Google Play Store account got everything wrong, and we literally mean everything.
The original premise was this: “Sonic, but as you scroll he gets older and older.” Seems simple, right? All you had to do was find images of Sonic throughout history and list them in chronological order. For the Play Store, it was anything but.
Things started off on the wrong foot when the Play Store tried to show an image of Sonic from 1991, but there was just one problem. Tails was in the corner of the image, and Tails wasn’t introduced as a character until the following year. The Play Store actually showed a 2013 version of the original game, which was referred to as “8-bit glory.” In fact, the original Sega Genesis version of Sonic from 1991 was a 16-bit game.
Sonic, but as you scroll he gets older and oldera thread 🧶🧵April 27, 2024
Think the errors stopped there? Think again. When trying to find a picture of 1993’s Sonic, the Play Store shared one from 2014 instead. It’s pretty obvious to anyone, even those without a knack for Sonic, that the Sonic design in this post was not from 1993.
Instead of showing the 1996 Sonic, the Play Store posted a 2013 iteration. In place of a 2003 version of Sonic, we got a 2005 version. When trying to show the 2006 character, a post shared 2017 Sonic. And in a truly-remarkable error, the Play Store ended up correctly showing the original 1991 game — but called it a “2018 Sonic” that “weirdly looked like 90’s Sonic.”
Originally, we thought the Play Store finally got one right when it shared a screengrab from the Sonic the Hedgehog movie, claiming it was an example of “2020 Sonic.” But as it turns out, this frame comes from the second Sonic film, which was released in 2022. Wrong again.
2020 Sonic. It was a strange year for us all let’s leave it at that 😵💫 pic.twitter.com/ngNp2seo5mApril 27, 2024
Of course, Community Notes had a field day with all these mistakes, covering the entire thread with corrections. By the end, the official Sonic the Hedgehog himself chimed in:
what are you doingApril 28, 2024
What you need to know
- In what was supposed to be a fun look back at an iconic video came character, the official Google Play Store account revealed it doesn’t know anything about Sonic the Hedgehog on X (formerly Twitter).
- Every single post in the X thread was hit with a Community Note pointing out the glaring and obvious inaccuracies.
- By the end, we heard from Sonic himself, who joined in with X users poking fun at the original Google Play Store thread.
The official Google Play Store account on X (formerly Twitter) frequently highlights video games, characters, and pop-culture moments on its page. But something that was supposed to be a fun look back at one of the most iconic video game characters ever ended up backfiring for the Play Store’s social team. In a thread about the history of Sonic the Hedgehog, the Google Play Store account got everything wrong, and we literally mean everything.
The original premise was this: “Sonic, but as you scroll he gets older and older.” Seems simple, right? All you had to do was find images of Sonic throughout history and list them in chronological order. For the Play Store, it was anything but.
Things started off on the wrong foot when the Play Store tried to show an image of Sonic from 1991, but there was just one problem. Tails was in the corner of the image, and Tails wasn’t introduced as a character until the following year. The Play Store actually showed a 2013 version of the original game, which was referred to as “8-bit glory.” In fact, the original Sega Genesis version of Sonic from 1991 was a 16-bit game.
Sonic, but as you scroll he gets older and oldera thread 🧶🧵April 27, 2024
Think the errors stopped there? Think again. When trying to find a picture of 1993’s Sonic, the Play Store shared one from 2014 instead. It’s pretty obvious to anyone, even those without a knack for Sonic, that the Sonic design in this post was not from 1993.
Instead of showing the 1996 Sonic, the Play Store posted a 2013 iteration. In place of a 2003 version of Sonic, we got a 2005 version. When trying to show the 2006 character, a post shared 2017 Sonic. And in a truly-remarkable error, the Play Store ended up correctly showing the original 1991 game — but called it a “2018 Sonic” that “weirdly looked like 90’s Sonic.”
Originally, we thought the Play Store finally got one right when it shared a screengrab from the Sonic the Hedgehog movie, claiming it was an example of “2020 Sonic.” But as it turns out, this frame comes from the second Sonic film, which was released in 2022. Wrong again.
2020 Sonic. It was a strange year for us all let’s leave it at that 😵💫 pic.twitter.com/ngNp2seo5mApril 27, 2024
Of course, Community Notes had a field day with all these mistakes, covering the entire thread with corrections. By the end, the official Sonic the Hedgehog himself chimed in:
what are you doingApril 28, 2024
